Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis addressed the ongoing controversy surrounding the tomb of Aurangzeb, stating that the government remains committed to protecting it as a historical site but will not tolerate any efforts to glorify Aurangzeb’s legacy. Fadnavis emphasized that while the tomb must be safeguarded due to its historical significance, attempts to honor or glorify the controversial Mughal emperor’s actions would not be allowed.

“It is unfortunate that the government must protect Aurangzeb’s grave, despite his history of persecution,” Fadnavis said. “But any attempt to glorify his legacy will not succeed.”

Hindutva Bodies Push for Demolition

Fadnavis' remarks come amidst growing pressure from Hindutva groups calling for the demolition of Aurangzeb’s tomb, which they have referred to as a "symbol of pain and slavery." These groups, particularly from the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), have been vocal in their demands, citing Aurangzeb’s alleged persecution of Hindus and his role in historical conflicts with the Marathas.

State Cabinet Minister Nitesh Rane also waded into the debate, suggesting that a “Babri Masjid-type” action could be taken, encouraging Hindutva groups to take matters into their own hands while the government fulfilled its duty. “The government will do its part, but Hindutva groups must do theirs,” Rane remarked during an event in Pune marking Shivaji Maharaj's birth anniversary.

Rane also criticized recent attempts to label Shivaji Maharaj as a "secular king," stressing that Shivaji was the founder of Hindvi Swarajya, a kingdom based on Hindu principles.

Increased Security Around the Tomb

The controversy surrounding the tomb has prompted the Maharashtra police to tighten security around Aurangzeb’s tomb in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar district. In response to threats from right-wing groups, authorities have implemented new protocols, requiring visitors to register and provide identification before accessing the site.

To ensure security, multiple posts have been established along the route leading to the tomb, from the entrance of Khultabad town to the tomb itself. The Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) had earlier submitted a memorandum to Chief Minister Fadnavis, demanding the removal of the tomb, citing Aurangzeb’s controversial role in historical events such as his persecution of Hindus and the execution of Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj, son of Shivaji Maharaj. The VHP has also highlighted incidents such as Aurangzeb's destruction of temples in Kashi, Mathura, and Somnath as further reasons for their opposition to the tomb’s preservation.

Visitor Numbers Decrease Amid Tensions

In the wake of the controversy, Parvez Kabeer Ahmed, the caretaker of the tomb, noted a drop in visitor numbers. However, he added that this decrease is typical during Ramzan, the holy month for Muslims. “The situation here is peaceful, and people should not believe in rumors,” Ahmed said. He confirmed that around 100 visitors typically visit the tomb daily, but acknowledged that the number had declined since the calls for the tomb’s removal started making headlines.

Security Measures

To maintain order, the Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar police have deployed additional forces, including a State Reserve Police Force (SRPF) company consisting of 50 officers, along with 30 local police personnel and 20 Home Guard jawans. These officers are stationed around the tomb to ensure security and to monitor any developments related to the ongoing protests and demands for the removal of the site.

A Sensitive Issue with Broader Implications

The debate over Aurangzeb's tomb reflects broader discussions about historical legacies and religious sentiments in India. As the government balances the need to protect historical sites while respecting public opinion, the security measures and continued dialogue will be crucial in managing the sensitive situation. The situation also underscores the growing influence of Hindutva groups in shaping political discourse around historical monuments in the country.

With increased security and continued scrutiny, the fate of Aurangzeb’s tomb in Maharashtra remains uncertain, and its outcome could have broader implications for historical preservation and religious harmony in India.